Stop Staring at the Risk. Decide Your Response.

One of my favourite concepts from project and programme management is risk response.

I think project management techniques are so valuable because they often work far beyond projects. Risk responses are a perfect example.

Before I go any further, it's worth pointing out that risk has something of a brand problem. Most people hear the word risk and immediately think threat. They think about what might go wrong, what could be lost, what could fail.

In project management a risk is simply an uncertain event that may or may not happen.

If it would have a negative effect, we call it a threat. If it would have a positive effect, we call it an opportunity.

That distinction matters because many people spend their lives trying to avoid risk altogether, when what they really mean is avoiding threats. In doing so, they often overlook opportunities sitting in exactly the same category: uncertain events that could work in their favour.

This approach to risk and risk responses stop me seeing these uncertain events as something frightening that needs to be eliminated. Instead, they remind me that uncertainty can contain all of danger, possibility, neutrality.

Identifying what might go wrong, calculating how likely it is, and scoring how bad it would be if it happened is also useful, but for me, the interesting bit is deciding what you're going to do about it and there’s a pattern here, with only a handful of possible responses.

If you are dealing with a Threat, you can:

---

Avoid it.

Take action to remove the threat entirely, so the uncertain event can no longer occur. This usually involves changing a decision, approach, scope or timeline to eliminate the risk at its source.

Question: How could I make this risk impossible?

Reduce it.

Take proactive action to lower either the likelihood of the risk occurring or the severity of its consequences if it does occur.

Question: How can I make this less likely or less damaging?

Transfer it.

Move some or all of the consequences of the risk to another party who is better placed to manage it, typically through insurance, outsourcing, warranties, contracts, or specialist expertise.

Question: Who else could carry some of this risk?

Create a fallback plan.

Prepare a contingency plan that will only be implemented if the risk materialises. This does not reduce the probability of the risk occurring but limits the disruption or damage if it does.

Question: If this happens, what will I do next?

Accept it.

Make a conscious decision not to take specific action because the risk falls within acceptable limits or the cost of responding outweighs the potential downside.

Question: Can I get comfortable living with this uncertainty?

If you are dealing with an Opportunity, you can:

---

Exploit it.

Take deliberate action to ensure that a positive opportunity occurs and that its benefits are fully realised.

Question: How can I make this happen?

Enhance It.

Take proactive steps to increase either the likelihood of an opportunity occurring or the benefits it would generate if it does occur.

Question: How can I increase the chances of success or make the upside even bigger?

Share it.

Partner with another party so that both the potential benefits and the potential consequences are shared. This is commonly used where collaboration increases the chances of success or makes uncertainty more manageable.

Question: Who could share both the risk and the reward?

Reject it.

Make a conscious decision not to pursue or invest in an opportunity, even though it could produce benefits. The opportunity may continue to be monitored in case circumstances change.

Question: Just because this is possible, does that mean I should pursue it?

---

We Use Risk Responses More instinctively Than We Realise

Most people already use risk responses every day.

• Insurance is risk transfer.

• Emergency savings are a fallback plan.

• Wearing a seatbelt is risk reduction.

• Changing a holiday destination due to a hurricane threat is risk avoidance.

• Deciding not to worry about possible rain during a summer walk is risk acceptance.

Yet when we're anxious, we often forget all of these options exist. The brain becomes obsessed with identifying threats while neglecting the question of response. It's like standing in front of a fire alarm and discussing how loud it might be, rather than planning where the exits are.

When people face uncertainty, they often ask:

"What if it goes wrong?"

This question encourages rumination. Creates anxiety.

I find a more useful question is:

"If it goes wrong, what will I do?"

This question encourages planning. Creates agency.

You may still decide that a particular risk is unacceptable.

You may conclude that total avoidance is the right response.

You may determine that more mitigation is needed before proceeding.

All fine.

The point isn't to eliminate risk but to recognise that uncertainty is only half of the equation; the other half is your response.

Once you stop staring at the risk and start planning your response, uncertainty often becomes far less intimidating.

---

Related Journal Insights