Organisations confuse positive sentiment with successful sense-making, and treat "buy-in" as the objective
I think many organisations confuse positive sentiment with successful sense-making, and treat "buy-in" as the objective.
But wanting buy-in is often just a polite way of saying: "I want people to feel positive about this." The event gets designed to excite people, the messaging gets designed to reassure (rather than educate, inform or invite) people, and the measures of success become things like:
Energy in the room
Positive feedback forms
Enthusiasm and visible optimism
Statements of support
The problem is that none of those things tell you whether people understand the change. After a town hall or away day, leaders ask:
Did people like it?
Are they engaged?
Are they excited?
Have we got buy-in?
I almost never ask those questions. The question I care about is:
Do people understand more than they did before?
Related Journal Insights
A psychological orientation towards status, control, and self-protection may overpower the collaborative instincts that good project management usually requires. A few different bodies of literature speak to this. I wanted to dig further into some of these.
One of the most counterintuitive things I do when preparing a major change announcement, a team away day, or the launch of a high-risk, uncertain project is I discourage people from reaching a decision too quickly.
When people work on a transformation programme, they are not always just delivering tasks; they may also be living with uncertainty about their role, their team, their managers, their status, their expertise, their workload, and sometimes their future employment.
Every transformation introduces friction. These frictions are temporary problems created by the act of transition. They are not defects in the plan, they are the point at which the plan meets reality.
In a period of transition, rewarding the highest target, the fastest adopter, or the top scorer is a mistake.
While resistance is real and ever‑present, it is only one piece of a much wider and more valuable discipline.
For decades, management has been framed around a single dominant idea: managing people to a defined performance standard. But that framing becomes limiting when organisations are trying to change, not just perform.